Gem lore is endless. Every culture has its own beliefs about specific stones, and those beliefs are often tied to that cultures history, geography, and. Although a quick internet search finds many women complaining of or asking about postDepo symptoms, there isnt much published scientific evidence on the topic. Which One Sigma 5. I vs Sigma 5. 0mm f. II Art. Sigma recently updated their 5. A new alternative comic series intended to challenge and eventually replace the SJWconverged comics of DC and Marvel. AltHero is a world not too terribly. Art branding badge, but also a totally new look to the lens. The new Art offering joins the 3. DSLRs under the new Global Vision that the company is touting right now. Many folks own the older Sigma 5. In our real world tests, we explore the differences. Odin Er Has Stopped Working' title='Odin Er Has Stopped Working' />Editors Note Check out our first sample images, full review, and comparison posts against the 3. Tech Specs. Ergonomics. When you look at both lenses, you can almost immediately tell a lot by the looks. The older lens looks like Sigma was purposely trying to target a market that couldnt afford something like the Canon 5. L but wanted great quality anyway. Both lenses also feel different and are also different sizes. The newer lens is taller and thinner while the older one is shorter and fatter. Theyre two totally different beasts when it comes to ergonomics. The new 5. 0mm f. DG, which won a coveted Editors Choice award from us. The Sigma 3. 5mm f. Word Could Not Re Establish A Dde Connection To Microsoft there. Canons 3. 5mm offerings. Build Quality. When it comes to the build of both lenses, the newer 5. But the older version is a bit more stocky. If Sigma were able to put the quality of the optics into the older body, we would have an absolutely perfect lens. But for what its worth, the new 5. It feels great in the hands and honestly gives off the feeling that the lens was made just for you with precision and care. Odin Er Has Stopped Working' title='Odin Er Has Stopped Working' />Autofocus. Despite being a heavier lens, Sigmas newer 5. We tried both lenses in both well lit and low lit situations with the Canon 5. D Mk IIa camera that wasnt known for the absolute best focusing speeds or accuracy. However, both lenses nailed their focusing almost 1. Any misses that came were more in low lit situations. Its worth it to note that we needed to go into Canons menus and microadjust both lenses though. Two years ago, I switched entirely over to Sigma lenses from Canon and microadjusted the old 5. The newer 5. 0mm f. Art lens also needed the same level of adjustment. For those of you not in the know, microadjustment is something that you do to ensure that your lens will always focus accurately. Almost every manufacturer does it and almost all DSLRs need itbut the problem is more prevalent with third party lenses. Also note that not every DSLR offers microadjustment. For Nikon and Sony, its called AF Finetuning. This is best done with a lens chart, a tripod, and flashes. However, I learned how to do it in the field when I was a working photojournalist and paparazzi. Image Quality. We conducted two tests with the lenses. Both tests involved the lenses being put on a tripod. We shot the same scene for each lens at the same exposure and equalized the histograms in Adobe Lightroom 5. Both lenses were focused on the same spot. The first test was done at f. Sigma 5. 0mm f. 1. Version 1. Sigma 5. IIThe second test was done at f. The flash and receivers was the Phottix Odin used with the MitrosSigma 5. Version 1. Sigma 5. Version IIDifferences. From what we can tell, there isnt a major difference in the image quality at f. Additionally, we also found that they have different fields of view. Both lenses exhibit excellent sharpness at f. The main differences that we found were not only in the field of view, but the sharpness wide open and the bokeh. Bokeh. As far as bokeh goes, both lenses have very nice out of focus areas. However, we found the newer 5. Art lens to be a tad creamier. If youre looking for absolutely nothing else but some bokehlicious images, then youll be fine with either lens offering, though the newer one gives slightly better results but no one would be able to tell unless the two were put side by sidekeep that one in mind folks Sharpness. Camp Lo Black Hollywood Rar'>Camp Lo Black Hollywood Rar. Where we saw the biggest differences in the lenses has to do with the sharpness wide open. In this case, Sigmas newer lens outperforms the older lens with almost no contest. Indeed, the newer lens is highly on par with its 3. Art cousin. Color Rendition. Both lenses deliver almost identical color rendition, though the newer 5. Art lens tends to give a bit more of a saturated look to colors than the older version. The newer lens also seems to be less contrasty. Color Fringing. Both lenses control color fringing very well, but the newer 5. Art lens does a better job except in the most absolute and extreme of situations. Again though, color fringing is easily nerfed with some sliders in Adobe Lightroom 5 and it should never be something that bothers you too much. Conclusions. In all truthfulness, both lenses offer great image quality overall and they both wont disappoint you at all. The real differences have to do with pricing, build quality, and how much you want to pixel peep your images. If you have clients as a working photographer, you can still create beautiful and totally sellable images with both lenses. If youre an owner of the older 5. Work After Prison Programs more. Sure, the newer Art lens is sharper and better built, but it isnt going to be a majorly bad deal if you spring for the older one.